๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 502+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (502 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12
$20
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

- at no time used- limited edition -24oz

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
basic Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler

- at no time used
- limited edition
-24oz

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 237226

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Tumblers

Original Price: $20 USD

Sale Price:$12 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9877 reviews
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Jacksonville, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
top decision​
The Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler is effortless to use and looks terrific. So happy with this purchase!
48 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท St. Louis, MO 
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Worth every penny
After a few days, the Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler is practical which is good enough.
7 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
first-rate
Honestly, it feels solid enough and it works for me. Packaging was elementary.​
19 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
For the price, it works well enough which is good enough.
46 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase 
7 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
From my experience, it works as described which feels reasonable.
46 people found this helpful